In the work, there are often procurement plans reported by safety production officials, requiring anti-smashing and anti-piercing safety shoes, but the actual use effect is not good, because the anti-piercing safety shoes, plus the anti-piercing steel floor, to some extent reduce The comfort of the labor insurance shoes, the employees will feel harder, and increase the purchase cost of the enterprise. At present, the Kevlar material is used instead of the steel bottom plate on the market, which improves the comfort to a certain extent, and the cost is also obviously improved. See large-scale use.
So is the employee demand too high? No, most of the time, the production environment does not need anti-piercing safety shoes, only need to prevent smashing. For example, the factory workshop usually has strict process management, environmental management, and generally no nails appear on the ground, and large iron filings appear. At the time, we should use anti-smash safety shoes. If there is electrical insulation, it can be added. Because there is no need to prevent smashing and puncture, there will be complaints. If there are items such as nails on the ground, be sure to use anti-mite. Piercing safety shoes, in order to safety staff will not complain about anything, after all, to protect the safety of the foot first, related to each foot.
Where is the use of anti-smashing and anti-piercing insulation shoes? The conventional construction is the construction site. When the probability of occurrence of nails is relatively large, labor safety shoes with anti-piercing function must be selected. If your employees are not working in a single occasion, there are many mobile occasions, and according to the working environment, select the multi-functional safety shoes needed when planning, and the anti-piercing safety shoes cannot be superimposed with the functions of electrically insulated safety shoes.